Ads Board - Free Advertising and Marketing

Full Version: Lance Armstrong doping Livestrong
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
The chief executive officer of the Livestrong China Wholesale Youth Football Jerseys Foundation keeps a quote pinned to the wall behind his computer.

It dates to August 2010, just as federal prosecutors were investigating Lance cheap nfl football jerseys Armstrong, Livestrong's founder. In a news article, a national charities expert predicted how the probe would affect the foundation.

"It is just going to devastate them," the quote says.

MORE: USADA: Cycling head flip fopped on ArmstrongMORE: WADA asks cycling union to stay out of caseTwo years later, Livestrong forges on, striving to keep the focus on its massive mission: supporting cancer survivors. But now the charity must deal with questions about how it can unglue itself from formal accusations that its famous benefactor cheated to become a champion cyclist.

The impact already has hit the foundation. A lucrative contract with triathlons is in jeopardy. Anti Doping Agency's case against Armstrong. After years of rumors and accusations, nearly three times more Americans dislike Armstrong than like him, according to Q Scores, a company that measures the likability of personalities. USADA's mission is to protect the integrity of competition, and it says numerous witnesses will testify they saw Armstrong use banned substances and blood transfusions to improve his performance. Armstrong maintains his innocence and says he has never failed a drug test.

Armstrong's attorneys are trying to halt USADA's case a legal fight that will open with a hearing Friday in a federal courthouse two miles from Livestrong headquarters in Austin, Armstrong's hometown. Foundation officials emphasize that the doping allegations have nothing to do with the charity, but the question is whether the public agrees.

"The fundamental premise upon which people give to charity is trust," says Ken Berger, CEO of Charity Navigator, a charity watchdog. "It's the life's blood of a charity: the trust of the public. And if a charity is built on the reputation and founding of a person that the public begins to lose trust in, then, by extension, it can potentially threaten the organization as well."

Berger made similar comments in 2010. It's his quote hanging in the office of Doug Ulman, Livestrong's CEO.

"It's motivation," Ulman says.

It's also a warning. To thrive regardless of how the doping allegations are resolved, Livestrong needs the popularity of its mission to transcend the reputation of its founder. It might already have done so. In the first six months of 2012, more cancer survivors 8,000 contacted the foundation for help than in any other similar period of any year. The average donation has slightly increased this year to $75, from $72 two years ago, according to Livestrong. That put his deal with the World Triathlon Corporation in jeopardy a one year agreement that was to pay $1 million to the foundation in exchange for Armstrong's appearances. So far, the WTC has paid Livestrong $250,000.

Through a spokesman, Armstrong deferred comment to Livestrong.

"The good news is the organization is as strong as ever," Ulman says. "It continues to serve our mission. It continues to enjoy unparalleled levels of support. That said, we do see an impact. One is the constant barrage of media attention, even though it has nothing to do with the mission (of the foundation)."

That's why if Armstrong's lawsuit fails, he might have to decide between accepting USADA's allegations, fighting them in arbitration or cutting a deal that would make Armstrong eligible to compete in triathlons.

Livestrong also has felt effects in its dealings with Congress. The foundation typically works with legislators who support its work. But Dt5FW6a9x lately, it's been getting more questions from elected officials about the doping charges. Rep. Livestrong spokeswoman Katherine McLane said the lobbying firm was Patton Boggs, which she said represents the foundation on its domestic cancer policy and funding goals.

It's a fine line for the foundation to walk. Livestrong wants to support its founder, though it only can do so to a point, lest it breach ethical boundaries. Reports that Livestrong had discussed the matter with Serrano's office sparked speculation online that perhaps the foundation sought to prod the government to call off USADA, noting Serrano is the ranking Democrat on a subcommittee overseeing part of the agency's budget.

Livestrong also discussed the doping allegations in a June meeting with Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R Texas, whose office said the foundation cheap jerseys supply did not seek political support to influence the case.

"The issue of the USADA case came up only in the context of how it might impact public relations for the foundation," said Dean Pagani, Hutchison's press secretary. "The meeting was about the mission of the foundation." No request was made of the senator, the spokesman said.

Ulman said the foundation does not financially support Armstrong's legal case. "That would be entirely inappropriate," he says.

While Livestrong seeks to separate the founder from the mission, it's not easy. In many ways, Armstrong is Livestrong. Yellow jerseys from his Tour de France victories hang from a wall at headquarters. Ulman, a cancer survivor himself, says he talks frequently with Armstrong, who is the foundation's biggest donor at about $6.3 million. In its most recently available federal tax forms, from 2010, the foundation still refers to itself by its previous name: the Lance Armstrong Foundation. http://www.cradlesoap.com/event/344
https://www.transfemme.com/forum/tgtf-su...-green-bay
http://www.hotridesmag.com/profiles/blog...new-jersey